Ret. USMC Captain and Eisenhower Media Network Executive Director Matthew Hoh addresses the UN Security Council during its briefing on Ukraine (March 24, 2024)
Eisenhower Media Network
ABOLISH NUCLEAR WEAPONS The ‘apocalyptic’ chess game between the superpowers, that is, between those that move on the highest plane of our civilization, is being played according to the rule ‘if either “wins” it is the end of both’; it is a game that bears no resemblance to whatever war games preceded it. Its ‘rational’ goal is deterrence, not victory, and the arms race, no longer a preparation for war, can now be justified only on the grounds that more and more deterrence is the best guarantee of peace. To the question how shall we ever be able to extricate ourselves from the obvious insanity of this position
there is no answer.”
— Hannah Arendt
(For possible answers see ICAN.org and listen carefully to Matthew Hoh.)
Matthew Hoh is the Associate Director of the Eisenhower Media Network, an organization of expert former military, intelligence, and civilian national security officials who seek to reach broad, cross-partisan audiences in diverse media outlets and among the American people – who increasingly sense that U.S. foreign policy today is not making them, or the world, safer. Matthew is a former military captain, Afghanistan State Department officer, disabled Iraq War veteran and Senior Fellow Emeritus with the Center for International Policy.
Ernst Rudolf Mecke
March 25, 2024 at 3:50 PM - Reply
I have said already years ago that a slow but anyway POSSIBLE way of reducing the number of nuclear weapons very much would be to establish an internatinal nuclear strike force which would retaliate against ANY power which would attack some other power with nuclear weapons. The big powers would be invited to transfer more and more of their nuclear weapons to this international strike force (which is, after all, also protecting THEM). Psychologists would have to think VERY carefully how to select and recruit the people who have access to the “button”. But once a reasonably convincing form of that force is established and armed, simple human behavior plus financial considerations will result (with time!) in at least a clear and strong reduction of the number of nuclear weapons in the world. – More detailed considerations and explanations can be provided on request.
have already years ago said that a slow but anyway POSSIBLE way of reducing the number of
I have said already years ago that a slow but anyway POSSIBLE way of reducing the number of nuclear weapons very much would be to establish an internatinal nuclear strike force which would retaliate against ANY power which would attack some other power with nuclear weapons. The big powers would be invited to transfer more and more of their nuclear weapons to this international strike force (which is, after all, also protecting THEM). Psychologists would have to think VERY carefully how to select and recruit the people who have access to the “button”. But once a reasonably convincing form of that force is established and armed, simple human behavior plus financial considerations will result (with time!) in at least a clear and strong reduction of the number of nuclear weapons in the world. – More detailed considerations and explanations can be provided on request.
have already years ago said that a slow but anyway POSSIBLE way of reducing the number of