In the last election, as broadcasters fired journalists, they cheered on the wave of negative, manipulative super PAC advertising and the rise of carnivalesque political coverage.

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 25: Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) talks to reporters after a brief press conference before an Armed Services conference committee meeting on the National Defense Authorization Act on Capitol Hill, October 25, 2017 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) talks to reporters after a brief press conference before an Armed Services conference committee meeting on the National Defense Authorization Act on Capitol Hill, October 25, 2017 in Washington, DC.Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images

IN A RULING seen as a major win for the largest media conglomerates in the country, the Federal Communications Commission voted to repeal the Main Studio Rule, a 77-year-old regulation that required local television and radio broadcasters to maintain physical studios in the communities they serve.

The Tuesday vote, along party lines, with Republican commissioners supporting repeal, clears the way for major media companies to continue buying up local stations and eliminating positions for journalists, while centralizing programming decisions.

One of the primary arguments made by media companies petitioning the FCC for the repeal was that social media renders local stations an anachronistic requirement of the past.

The National Association of Broadcasters, the trade group for major broadcasting companies, argued that local studios are no longer necessary because stations today “are active on multiple social media platforms” that allow them to interact with their audience.

Nexstar Media Group, a conglomerate that owns 170 stations, including KRON-TV in San Francisco and the CBS affiliate in Las Vegas, told the agency that consumers prefer to interact with their “stations through social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.” Trinity Broadcasting and McCarthy Radio Enterprises made similar arguments in the filings, claiming that social media sites such as Facebook can replace the interactions with the local community that physical studios once provided.

Univision, in its filing, noted that “Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, etc.” are better platforms for facilitating “continuous community-station discourse,” rather than hosting multiple personnel at physical locations.

One of the most brazen arguments came from the Multicultural Media, Telecom and Internet Council, a group long viewed as a front for industry.

In its filing in support of repeal, MMTC celebrated further media consolidation, claiming that streamlining “labor, rent, utilities and similar overhead expenses” will bring more efficiency, which, depending on your definition and goals, could be true enough. But the group also argued that local journalism can be replaced by ordinary citizens using social media. “It has become increasingly apparent that every smartphone user is potentially a ‘broadcast journalist,’” the MMTC filing claims. The best way to interact with the audience, according to MMTC, which echoed the concerns of the broadcasting industry, is to use sites such as Facebook and Twitter.

MMTC receives significant funding from broadcasting interests, such as the National Association of Broadcasters, iHeartRadio, Univision, CBS Corp., and Media General, the broadcast television station conglomerate that recently merged with Nexstar.

After the repeal vote, FCC Commissioner Michael O’Rielly claimed that eliminating the rule would boost local programming because the cost savings associated with eliminating local studios would be invested in better local content.

But there is little evidence to suggest that broadcasters are itching to spend more to develop high-quality, locally driven content. In fact, the recent experience of Sinclair Broadcasting is quite the opposite. Sinclair, which is set to own 200 stations after a recent buying spree, has used its market position to centralize news operations into partisan, Republican Party-friendly programming.

There is nothing in the rule that prevents the cost savings from shuttering local stations from flowing directly to company shareholders. Following its merger with Media General, Nexstar posted increased revenue of 139 percent, a boost that brought the company a record quarterly profit.

Despite soaring stock prices and profits from their parent companies, broadcasters have engaged in a wave of layoffs, cutting or, in many cases, eliminating entire journalism teams. Free Press, one of the only public interest groups to oppose repeal of the rule, noted in its filing that by 2014, 86 percent of local television stations did not employ a single statehouse reporter. After buying a local NBC affiliate in Toledo, Ohio, Sinclair later laid off staff and outsourced the news operation to another Sinclair-owned station in South Bend, Indiana.

“At a time when so many local journalists are struggling to find and keep their jobs, it is tremendously short­sighted to trumpet the savings broadcasters may accrue from laying off local staff,” Free Press policy analyst Dana Floberg noted.

Driven by profits, broadcasters have lobbied to weaken the public’s access to quality information about their elected representatives. Broadcasters, in the wake of the Citizens United decision, which unleashed a torrent of ad dollars, are increasingly reliant on political advertising. That creates perverse incentives for how the stations engage with well-heeled interest groups seeking to influence the public. As The Intercept has reported, broadcasters routinely lobby aggressively against campaign finance reforms, including a proposal to allow candidates equal access to the airwaves, and even a minor requirement that political advertising disclosures must be posted online.

In the last election, as broadcasters fired journalists, they cheered on the wave of negative, manipulative super PAC advertising and the rise of carnivalesque political coverage. “The more they spend, the better it is for us. … Go Donald! Keep getting out there!” Les Moonves, head of CBS Corp., a major broadcast radio and television station owner, memorably told investors.

Media for the people!  Learn more about Rise Up Times and how to sustain
People Supported News.
Follow RiseUpTimes on Twitter RiseUpTimes @touchpeace

No Peace! No Justice!  Please share this post.

The contents of Rise Up Times do not necessarily reflect the views of the editor.

One Comment

  1. coleenrowley October 30, 2017 at 9:03 PM
    Quoted from the article.
    “Facebook, the world’s top social media platform, is reportedly seeking to hire hundreds of employees with US national security clearance licenses.
    Purportedly with the aim of weeding out “fake news” and “foreign meddling” in elections.”
    If that plan, reported by Bloomberg, sounds sinister, that’s because it is. For what it means is that people who share the same worldview as US intelligence agencies, the agencies who formulate classified information, will have a direct bearing on what millions of consumers on Facebook are permitted to access.
    It’s as close to outright US government censorship on the internet as one can dare to imagine, and this on a nominally independent global communication network. Your fun-loving place “where friends meet.”
    Orwell was right!

Comments are closed.

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Subscribe via email
Enter your email address to follow Rise Up Times and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,899 other followers


VIDEO: Militarism, Climate Chaos, and the Environment






Go to Top