Hong Kong: Are These Really Protests We Want to Support? by Mary Beaudoin

But it’s not just the British that protesters appealed to for support. American flags were also prominent in street protests. The leader of the Hong Kong activist organization Demosistō, Joshua Wong, called for outside intervention by the U.S., Western Europe, and Japan to “liberate Hong Kong.”

HONG KONG, CHINA – SEPTEMBER 08: Protesters wave U.S flags outside the U.S consulate after delivering a petition on September 8, 2019 in Hong Kong, China. Pro-democracy protesters have continued demonstrations across Hong Kong despite the withdrawal of a controversial extradition bill as demonstrators call for the city’s Chief Executive Carrie Lam to immediately meet the rest of their demands, including an independent inquiry into police brutality, the retraction of the word ‘riot’ to describe the rallies, and the right for Hong Kong people to vote for their own leaders. (Photo by Carl Court/Getty Images)

By Mary Beaudoin  WAMM Newsletter  Vol. 37  Num. 5  Fall 2019

Should peace and justice advocates support pro-democracy efforts whenever they arise in the world? Even some U.S. alternative media identifying as liberal and progressive have joined the chorus, portraying the protests in Hong Kong as the noble pursuit of democratic freedoms, brave resistance to the authoritarian Chinese government oppressing the people.

Democratic freedoms aside, many nations in the world but particularly the U.S., Britain, and China have interests to protect in Hong Kong. The island-city is a special administrative district within China with a unique history. It was subject to British colonial rule for approximately 150 years but, under an agreement with the People’s Republic of China, in 1997 it was returned to China and governed as “one country, two systems” with its own legal and administrative systems. Hong Kong’s special status enabled it to become a leading financial center and tax haven for international corporations. Its free market is so free from regulation and accountability that the conservative American think tank, the Heritage Foundation, has consistently ranked the city as number one in its Index of Economic Freedom.[1]

The arrangement has been of mutual benefit to both foreigners and the Republic of China. As a Reuters primer explains: “China uses Hong Kong’s currency, equity, and debt markets to attract foreign funds, while international companies use Hong Kong as a Launchpad to expand into mainland China.” [2]

Hong Kong’s particular legal characteristics have not only enabled China to rise as an economic power and shelter foreign corporations from taxes and tariffs but they have also allowed an individual to get away with murder. That’s because Hong Kong lacks an extradition treaty for those who commit crimes in Taiwan and China. When a resident of Hong Kong was alleged to have murdered his pregnant girlfriend while on vacation in Taiwan in 2018, the accused fled back to Hong Kong where he couldn’t be prosecuted. Hong Kong’s administrative government attempted to amend its extradition law as a result of the incident. But protesters claimed extradition would extend to overreach by the People’s Republic and cause Hong Kong citizens to be deprived of their freedoms.

Anti-extradition protests were ignited.

Complaining of Washington’s and London’s interference in Chinese internal affairs, the following appeared in the government-sponsored China Daily, HK edition:

There are two reasons why they chose the extradition law amendment bill as a turning point in their disruptive Hong Kong strategy. One is their failure to seize Hong Kong’s governing power through their political proxies with ‘true democracy’ as an excuse. The other one is the need to facilitate the U.S. government’s updated global strategy since 2018 that regards China as its main rival. Zhou Bajun [3]

The protesters looked to London to assist them in their cause. Wearing hardhats, they smashed into the Hong Kong legislative chambers and raised the Union Jack.[4] On the street, people could be heard singing the British anthem “God Save the Queen” while waving the flag of their former colonial master. [5]

Subscribe to RiseUpTimes.org   
Support independent media
Donate Now!   

But it’s not just the British that protesters appealed to for support. American flags were also prominent in street protests. The leader of the Hong Kong activist organization Demosistō, Joshua Wong, called for outside intervention by the U.S., Western Europe, and Japan to “liberate Hong Kong.”

And U.S. officials responded.

With Wong by her side, on September 18, 2019, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi held a press conference in Washington on human rights in Hong Kong.[6] Something not lost on astute observers was that she made a statement reminiscent of one delivered by Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland in 2013, when, against the backdrop of a Chevron logo, Nuland praised “the brave people of the Maidan” as she encouraged the overthrow of the Ukrainian government in a color revolution. Pelosi welcomed the “very brave champions for democracy, for freedom of expression in Hong Kong,” advocating for the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019 (H.R. 3289) “to send an unequivocal message that the protesters of Hong Kong have the full support and backing of the United States in their quest for justice and freedom.” [7]

On October 13, in an interview with CBS Face the Nation, Ted Cruz, the U.S. senator from Texas, in a new rad persona, announced from Hong Kong: “I’m here, I’m dressed in all black standing in solidarity with the protesters.”[8] (When asked about reported violence, Cruz later claimed not to have observed any.)

This color revolution is characterized by wearing black clothing. Fewer in number than the masses of protesters in the street were those among them disguised by masks and with helmets protecting their heads, causing mayhem by destroying the commons – subway stations, buses, and the Hong Kong International Airport – as well as local businesses. These actors wielded steel rods, have beaten people considered the opposition, and threw gasoline bombs at police. Asia Times columnist Pepe Escobar, who lives in Hong Kong, describes the destructive acts as black bloc tactics borrowed from anarchist groups but more incendiary than the usual.[9]

Back in the U.S., the House of Representatives passed additional legislation based on the “responsibility to protect,” the humanitarian interventionist policy used to defend people in foreign countries from their own governments on the premise that they need to be protected and the U.S. should do it. The Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act passed the House with bipartisan support on October 15. The House also passed a resolution condemning the Chinese government in Beijing and, in addition, the Protect Hong Kong Act, which restricts non-lethal crowd control equipment exports to Hong Kong.[10] (While in July, the U.S. State Department had approved two billion in arms sales to Taiwan[11] and continues, under the 1033 program, to allow local U.S. law enforcement agencies to obtain surplus military equipment.) As of this writing, the Hong Kong bills are expected to pass in the Senate. [12]

Comparing this to American media and government reactions to our own protests, the China Daily commented: “It’s not hard to imagine the United States’ reaction if Chinese diplomats met leaders of Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter, or Never Trump protesters.”

The ordinary people of Hong Kong do have reason to be angry. The city is the most expensive in the world to live in with the highest rent, according to Deutsche Bank’s 2019 “Mapping the World’s Prices.” Many people experience extreme poverty. But their anger is directed at the Hong Kong city administration and Beijing, not the wealth gap.

Jimmy Lai, the Hong Kong billionaire and media mogul, widely believed to be funding the Hong Kong protests, came to the United States in early July to meet with Vice President Mike Pence, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, National Security Advisor John Bolton, and some senators.[13] His visit to Washington was preceded in March by a delegation of Hong Kong “democracy” advocates.[14]

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) fosters movements in foreign countries. Since its inception during the Reagan administration in 1983, the NED, a private foundation funded by the U.S. government but for which there is no government oversight, has been providing grants to nonprofit organizations, labor, and political parties in foreign countries to influence their populations. It boasts of the ability “to respond quickly where there is a need for political change.” In 1991, Allen Weinstein, NED founder and acting president said, “A lot of what we do today was done 25 years ago by the CIA.” David Ignatius as the foreign editor of the Washington Post, referred approvingly to the NED as “the sugar daddy of overt operations.”

“The NED should be called the “National Endowment for Attacking Democracy,” says Stephen Kinzer, who wrote “America’s Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq” (Henry Holt & Co., 2007).[15]

In a not to be missed video, Mintpress News editor Mnar A. Muhawesh pointed out that neo-cons, the notorious Elliot Abrams and Victoria Nuland [her again] sit on the NED board of directors. Muhawesh reports that “Since 2014, the year of Hong Kong’s Umbrella protests, the NED has officially poured over $29 million dollars into the island city in order to identify new avenues for democracy and political reform. But as the NED has already identified the Chinese government as despotic and a threat to democracy, this means that much of that money is defacto supporting groups to undermine that government and as Mintpress has previously reported much of that money went to the current groups that organized the protests.”[16]

Dimsum Daily, a Hong Kong-focused internet publication reporting from Norway on August 16, 2019, also traced the current anti-extradition protests back to Hong Kong’s 2014 Occupy Central (part of the Umbrella movement of agitators):

In an article we wrote yesterday, we detailed that the frontline anti-extradition protesters were potentially funded by Jimmy Lai and the American National Endowment for Democracy. Co-incidentally, Oslo Freedom Forum is also a New York-based non-profit Human Rights Foundation founded by human rights activist Thor Halvorssen. As exposed by the BBC documentary (website), 10,000 protesters during Occupy Central were trained as early as two years ago. Hence, it is highly possible that thousands of anti-extradition protesters were trained in 2017 or even 2018 to prepare themselves for the current anti-extradition protest.[17]

NOTE: Since this writing there is no longer access to Dimsum Daily through Google. The search engine is reported blocking sites critical of the Hong Kong protests.

Sara Flounders of the New York-based International Action Center, which advocates against war and racism, locates the Hong Kong demonstrations within a true global perspective of empire: “The escalating demonstrations are linked to the U.S. trade war, tariffs and military encirclement of China. Four hundred—​half—​of the 800 U.S. overseas military bases surround China. Aircraft carriers, destroyers, nuclear submarines, jet aircraft, Terminal High Altitude Area Defense missile batteries, and satellite surveillance infrastructures are positioned in the South China Sea, close to Hong Kong.” [18]

Our antiwar call should be: “U.S. out of Hong Kong and the Asia Pacific!

Mary Beaudoin is the editor of the Women Against Military Madness Newsletter.

[1] Heritage Foundation. Index of Economic Freedom. heritage.org/index.ranking Accessed October 30, 2019.
[2] Goetz, Lisa. “Why is Hong Kong considered a tax haven?” Investopedia. November 15, 2018. tinyurl.com/yx97md6s; Sin, Noah. “Explainer: How Important is Hong Kong to the rest of China?” Reuters. September 4, 2019. tinyurl.com/y39vl9zq
[3] Bajun, Zhou. “Foreign meddling in the SAR’s affairs must stop.” China Daily Hong Kong edition. July 31, 2019. tinyurl.com/yxqvwb6b
[4] Choi, Christy and Yu, Verna. “Hong Kong protests: demonstrators storm legislative building.” The Guardian. July 1, 2019. tinyurl.com/yxg2tuxc
[5] Guardian News. You Tube video. “Hong Kong Protesters Sing ‘God Save the Queen’ in plea to Britain.” September 15, 2019. Last accessed Nov. 4, 2919
[6] Zhang, Shuai. “China accuses Pelosi of ‘interference’ as battle rages to control narrative on Hong Kong.” CBS News tinyurl.com/y3zfm353
[7] Pelosi, Nancy. “Pelosi Remarks at Press Event on the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act” September 18, 2019. speaker.gov/newsroom/91819-0.
[8] “Transcript: Ted Cruz on ‘Face the Nation’” October 13, 2019. CBS News. tinyurl.com/y5hgp9ys. Last accessed Nov. 3, 2019.
[9] Escobar, Pepe. “Behind Hong Kong’s Black Terror.” Asia Times. October 11, 2019. tinyurl.com/y2ru5dwo
[10] Congressional Record. “Placing Restrictions on Teargas Exports and Crowd Control Technology to Hong Kong.” October 15, 2019. tinyurl.com/yyt9pkcl
[11] Horton, Chris. “Taiwan set to receive $2 billion in arms sales, drawing ire of Chinese.” New York Times. July 9, 2019. tinyurl.com/y6afguby
[12] Au, Bonnie. “US House passes Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act.” October 16, 2019. South China Morning Post. tinyurl.com/y3qqqy9a
[13] Wadhams, Nick. “Trump Team Sends Defiant Signal to Beijing by Meeting Hong Kong Activist.” Bloomberg News. July 10, 2019. tinyurl.com/y4a5ubja
[14] Cheung, Tony. “Beijing slams Hong Kong tycoon Jimmy Lai and U.S. officials over meetings on extradition bill.” July 9, 2019. tinyurl.com/yyaejgxt
[15] Kinzer, Steve. “Trump Is Cutting the National Endowment for Democracy and That’s a Good Thing.” March 15, 2017. Originally published in the Boston Globe. Common Dreams. tinyurl.com/y542wkd9
[16] Muhawesh A., Mnar. “The NED Strikes Again: How Neocon Money Is Funding the Hong Kong Protests.” September 9, 2019. tinyurl.com/y674h6dw; National Endowment for Democracy. ned.org/about/board-of-directors
[17] “Protesters Trained at Oslo Freedom Forum before anti-extradition protest.” August 16, 2019. dimsumdaily.hk/?s=Oslo  NOTE: This site, along with other sites critical of the Hong Kong protests, has been blocked by Google since research for this article began.
[18] Flounders, Sara. “Follow the Money behind Hong Kong protests.” August 16, 2019. International Action Center. tinyurl.com/y28ja3z9

Truth is not fake news.  Justice is not fake news. Learn more about and donate to Rise Up Times now and share articles widely. The people, Yes!

The contents of Rise Up Times do not necessarily reflect the views of the editor. Articles are chosen for republication based on the interest of our readers. Rise Up Times republishes articles from a number of other independent news sources as well as original articles and stories..

2 comments

  1. Coleen Rowley · · Reply

    Excellent info, Mary! I’ll be reposting it on FB.

    Like

  2. The lesser of two evils? Which is better… bad American Capitalism or bad Chinese Capitalism?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: