Cost Of Military Jet Could House Every Homeless Person In U.S. With $600,000 Home

 According to data provided by the Office of Management and Budget, the federal government spent roughly 19 times more on defense and international security assistance than it did on education in 2013.

F35

It’s no news that a large portion of our federal tax dollars goes towards defense spending. But your jaw might drop at the cost of the newest jet manufactured by the U.S. military, and just how much good could have been achieved domestically with the same price tag.

The $400 billion program to create a fleet of F-35 Joint Strike Fighter jets, which, as The Hill points out, is seven years behind schedule and chronically plagued with misfortunes and incompetencies, could have housed every homeless person in the U.S. with a $600,000 home.


Subscribe or “Follow” us on RiseUpTimes.org. Rise Up Times is also on Facebook! Check the Rise Up Times page for posts from this blog and more! “Like” our page today. Rise Up Times is also on  PinterestGoogle+ and Tumblr. Find us on Twitter at Rise Up Times (@touchpeace).


The staggering fact, configured by Think Progress, is just one of several figures the news source put into perspective for taxpayers. For example, the amount spent per year to build the F-35 jets could easily fulfill a $16.7 billion request by the United Nations Office of Coordination for Humanitarian Affairs to save countless lives from preventable causes around the world — and then have enough left over to fund UNICEF’s budget request, too. The full cost of the jets program could also fund the National School Lunch Program, which feeds about 31 million students annually, for the next 24 years.

The mind-boggling cost for a fleet of F-35 jets exemplifies what Steven Conn would consider a military budget that doesn’t have much of a positive impact on everyday Americans.

“Spending our taxes on the military doesn’t yield much to make our lives or our communities better,” Conn, a professor and Director of the Public History Program at Ohio State University, wrote on a HuffPost blog in April. “Big weapons systems and overseas military installations, to say nothing of feckless military adventures in Vietnam or Iraq, have done very little to fix our roads, improve our kids’ education, or push the boundaries of medical research.”

According to data provided by the Office of Management and Budget, the federal government spent roughly 19 times more on defense and international security assistance than it did on education in 2013. A graph created by the Peter G. Peterson Foundation illustrates that the U.S. spends more on defense than China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, France, the U.K., Germany, Japan and India combined.

RELATED ON HUFFPOST:

PHOTOS: What Countries Are Actually Spending On Education  To see this photo essay, go to the original on Huffington Post here.

Shutterstock

Around the Web

Pentagon Spends $150 Per Gallon In Green Jet Fuel | The Daily Caller

F-35 Joint Strike Fighter – The New York Times

The F-35: A Weapon That Costs More Than Australia – Dominic …

Fighter planes: Australia ‘already has’ the $12.4bn to pay for stealth …

Why The US Navy Should Build Smaller Aircraft Carriers

One comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: