Update: Cedar Lake Threatened by SW LRT (Minneapolis)

Updated April 25, 2014  Southwest LRT Meeting Rescheduled.

Development has huge support among politicians especially in an election year.  But who is representing the water? . . . Sacrificing water for transportation is short-term.

It seems clear that political officials who favor a pair of “shallow tunnels” between Cedar Lake and Isles for the Southwest Light Rail Train are not educated about the threat of reduced recharge to Cedar Lake. Reduced recharge means reduced water quality. I have repeatedly asked at Hennepin County Commission SW LRT meetings for an estimate of the dewatering amount for the proposed construction project and never had my inquiry acknowledged or answered.

Cedar Lake

Cedar Lake originally emptied to the northeast, into Bassett Creek. During the early 1900s rowboat craze, the Kenilworth Lagoon was dug between Cedar Lake and Isles, reversing the Cedar drainage from Bassett Creek to Minnehaha Creek along the Chain of Lakes.
Cedar Lake with Minneapolis skyline in the background

In the mid-1990s, the Seattle-based landscape architects Jones & Jones working on the design for the north part of the Cedar Lake Trail dug and dug but could not find the old northeast outflow path from Cedar Lake. Water channels and springs can be disappeared.

If the SW LRT double tunnel plan is adopted almost 9/10s of a mile (4700 linear feet) on the south and east of Cedar Lake will cut off a huge percentage of recharge groundwater feeding into the lake. Cedar Lake is spring fed. I live in Bryn Mawr, Cedar is my swimming lake. I feel the cool spring water here and there when I swim across Cedar in the summer.

Several years ago I asked former County Commissioner Gail Dorfman about the water vis-à-vis SW LRT and she said the water had not been considered. That, of course, was before any tunnel plans. Lots of numbers are quoted about the proposed SW LRT but no one is talking numbers about the water, specifically the amounts and path of dewatering and the threat to recharging Cedar Lake. Where are the water studies?

The Great Medicine Spring and Glenwood Spring

The Great Medicine Spring in Theodore Wirth Park along with nearby Glenwood Spring were permanently dewatered into the sewer system in the late 1980s with Interstate-394 construction. The practice was to dynamite and dewater both sides of a roadway.  Dewatering, like tiling a wet field for agriculture, uses buried pipes with holes where groundwater drips in and is channeled away.

The I-394 dewatering system, designed by MnDOT, funnels 2.5 million gallons of water a day into downtown sewers and mixes with street runoff during storms. Where the Bassett Creek pipe vomits water into the Mississippi a sign reads: WARNING Pregnant women and children under 6 should not eat fish taken here.

Roads and water don’t mix. City water is now piped into the Wirth Park tamarack bog.

“In 1874, Col. John H. Stevens, the first settler in Minneapolis, said that this [Great Medicine] spring was frequented by Native Americans, ‘who came hundreds of miles to get the benefit of its medicinal qualities.'” (Greg Brick, MN Ground Water Association, Vol. 16, No. 1, March 1997, p.6.)

Whatever unique properties the Great Medicine Spring contained are lost forever. Calcium and magnesium would have been in the water that trickled through limestone cracks, but what else? Imagine patients walking “hundreds of miles” for this curing water, this immune booster-plus liquid that restored the body. The Medicine Spring was unlike any other spring in our spring-rich landscape.

“Our most famous surficial spring is Glenwood-Inglewood Springs, known at office coolers throughout the Metro area. Winchell (1905) drafted a cross-section of the geology of this spring, showing how the water emerged from a gravel-clay contact on the banks of Bassett Creek, in Minneapolis. The water utilized at present is not derived from the original spring but from pipes driven through the clay into a water-bearing sand bed. Other surficial springs feed the Minneapolis chain of lakes. (Brick, Ibid.)

It is difficult to visualize underground water veins because they are invisible to us. Looking at other development projects in Minneapolis can reify the threats.

Lost Minneapolis Lakes

Minneapolis lost the quality of Brownie Lake to the Brownie-Cedar channel built in 1917 when Brownie dropped 10 feet. Another five foot drop occurred with the Kenilworth Canal between Cedar and Lake of the Isles. Brownie, in a hole protected from the winds, no longer “turns over” at springtime refreshing the lake’s oxygen so that layers of the lake do not support life.

Loring Lake “fed by unfailing springs of pure water” began to fail as early as 1887 with surrounding development.

Tiny Spring Lake at the base of Lowry Hill was acquired in 1893 but is now hidden by I-394. Brownie and Spring lakes function as views for people to walk around.

Powderhorn Lake began being reshaped, dredged and deepened but reduced in size, in 1895. By 1899 storm water intrusion affected water quality. Water level drop in Powderhorn was reported in 1911 and 1921. The lowest lake level was related to the 1963 trench dug for I-35W.

Development has huge support among politicians especially in an election year. But who is representing the water?

“Nature does not negotiate,” Kumi Naidoo, executive director of Greenpeace International reminds us. We are some of the 15 million Americans who flush our wastewater and drink out of the Mississippi. Our bodies are 70 percent water.

Lengthy shallow tunnels for a fixed SW commuter train that hardly serves city residents is proposed for the sieve that is the lake-blessed city of Minneapolis. It is a near sighted, flawed plan.

(c) 2014 Susu Jeffrey

Addendum from Susu:  Southwest Light Rail Transit is a Flawed Plan.

  • Unfair to Minneapolis residents
  • 2 tunnels adjacent to Cedar Lake threaten recharge
  • Cuts through established parkland
  • Avoids city populated areas  (click for map)
  • Final stop is Target Field, not an office in in the city that drives Minnesota business
  • Doubles time from Eden Prairie from 20 minutes on express bus to 40 minutes on LRT
  • $1.67 billion!
  • Minneapolis Mayor City Council, and Park Board oppose
  • Please phone Governor Dayton at 651-201-3400 and Mayor Hodges 612-673-2100 and say “Reroute the Southwest LRT.”

Update April 11, 2014

The route IS the problem with SW LRT. The route is now fixed and does not serve Uptown, the Lyndale or Nicollet or Hennepin or I-35W corridors. This is transit without the mass. (See http://www.swlrtcommunityworks.org/map.)

The route goes to the baseball stadium—great on game days but on workdays does not get workers near downtown offices. Everybody is for mass transit that can take people where they want to go. Unfortunately the North Star train is not a success. The Hiawatha line moves low income workers to the VA and the Mall of America, administrators to the Whipple Bldg., and lots of people to the airport yet each ride is publicly subsidized—like highways. All transit is subsidized. Like education—but you wouldn’t send your kid to just any school. Just any LRT is not “good.”

The tunnel between Cedar and Lake of the Isles was an idea to get federal funding. How about fixing the bridges?—re-up the public plumbing infrastructure?—install residential & business insulation? (a jobs program)—reforest storm damaged north Minneapolis? There’s is plenty of work to do.

In addition to not serving the densest urban population areas the SW LRT would require permanent dewatering at the top of the Chain of Lakes, i.e., Cedar Lake, which empties to Minnehaha  and on to the Mississippi. Permanent dewatering can never be mitigated.

Environmentally thinking, sacrificing water for transportation is short term. The SW LRT is a water issue in the same way the Enbridge tar sands pipeline across northern Minnesota is a water issue.


  1. This is a really good tip particularly to those fresh
    to the blogosphere. Short but very accurate information… Thanks for sharing this one.

    A must read article!


  2. We’re a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community.
    Your website offered us with valuable information to work on. You’ve done an impressive job and our entire community will be thankful to you.


  3. Hmm is anyone else having problems with the images on this blog loading?
    I’m trying to find out if its a problem on my end
    or if it’s the blog. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.


  4. Thanks for a marvelous posting! I genuinely enjoyed reading
    it, you happen to be a great author. I will make certain to bookmark your blog and will eventually come back sometime
    soon. I want to encourage you to definitely continue your great posts,
    have a nice evening!


  5. Hello there! I could have sworn I’ve visited this site before but after looking at a few of the articles I realized it’s new to me.
    Anyways, I’m definitely happy I discovered it and I’ll be bookmarking
    it and checking back often!


  6. Hello! I realize this is sort of off-topic but I had to ask.
    Does building a well-established website such as yours require
    a massive amount work? I’m completely new to blogging but
    I do write in my diary everyday. I’d like to start
    a blog so I can easily share my own experience and thoughts online.
    Please let me know if you have any suggestions or tips for brand new aspiring bloggers.


    1. I may not be the best person to ask. But yes, it is quite a bit of work but it also depends on how much work you want to put into it. How often you post. How you work at gathering people to read your blog. There are several free services out there. I use WordPress. Another I hear a lot about is blogspot.

      best of luck!


  7. Hi there Dear, are you actually visiting this web site daily,
    if so then you will without doubt get pleasant know-how.


  8. Reblogged this on Rise Up Times and commented:

    SWLRT hearing rescheduled to May 29th,


  9. I am really loving the theme/design of your site. Do you
    ever run into any internet browser compatibility problems?
    A small number of my blog visitors have complained
    about my site not working correctly in Explorer but looks
    great in Safari. Do you have any advice to help fix this issue?


    1. Sorry, I am not a techie.


  10. It’s actually a nice and helpful piece of information.
    I am glad that you shared this useful info with us. Please keep us informed like this.
    Thank you for sharing.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: